Comments on: MikroTik – CCR1072-1G-8S+ – PPPoE testing preview – 30,000 connections and queues.

By: ldruizdiaz

ldruizdiaz — Tue, 29 Dec 2020 23:24:39 +0000

In reply to Anderson. OSPF uses much more CPU than other routing protocols, and in the case of having PPPoE servers you should perhaps consider going BGP on that MIKROTIK.

By: OmarM89

OmarM89 — Wed, 19 Feb 2020 21:15:50 +0000

What is the traffic value for all these users

By: Tester

Tester — Thu, 13 Feb 2020 19:50:48 +0000

I´ve tried with 1800 connections and had much trouble with this router. I could only manage 1200 connections with traffic on it without throttling the CPU. I gess you could make them connect in the router but I don´t think it can really be useful with all these connections estabilished.

By: Anderson

Anderson — Tue, 01 Mar 2016 11:58:29 +0000

Very cool.
In my case user online is about 920 user (peak utilize bandwith 1,1gbps), when I cleaning all the session, it takes avg 80% CPU and caused my ospf flapping.

By: edison

edison — Tue, 08 Dec 2015 21:31:40 +0000

hello , I would like to know how this sensor total assets pppoe . thank you

By: nobas

nobas — Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:43:36 +0000

October 23, 2015 “We will be completing testing and should be publishing the results within the next week.”
When?

By: Rob

Rob — Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:37:10 +0000

Very interesting… can you post more info about queue config? 🙂

By: Vicente

Vicente — Fri, 06 Nov 2015 10:43:23 +0000

Cool! Thanks for testing this and writing the post.
¿Did you try to send some traffic trough the ppp connections?

By: Theone

Theone — Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:14:14 +0000

Good to See It working in PPPoE scenario.

Can You test its over PPTP server with 2 Simple Queues for upload and download and 2 PCQ with 1Mbits upload and 1 Mbits download.
How many connections it will handle of pptp like pppoe?