MikroTik – RouterOSv7 first look – VxLAN

VxLAN support added in 7.0beta5

MikroTik announced VxLAN support on Valentine’s Day (Feb 14th) of 2020.

This is a significant feature addition for RouterOSv7 as it will pave the way for a number of other additions like EVPN in BGP.

It will also give MikroTik the ability to appeal to enterprises and data centers that might need cost-effective VxLAN capable devices.

Service Providers are also moving towards VxLAN as a future replacement for VPLS so this is helpful for that market as well.

Download the OVA here:


The initial release of VxLAN is based on unicast and multicast to deliver Layer 2 frames.

As there is no EVPN support, the VTEPs must be manually configured for each endpoint in a full mesh configuration.

The VxLAN interface can then be bridged to a physical ethernet port or VLAN interface to deliver the traffic to the end host.

Lab Example

Here is an overview lab in EVE-NG with a basic setup using 3 linux servers on the same subnet which is carried as an overlay by VxLAN.

VxLAN reachability for VTEPs is acheived with OSPFv2 and loopback addresses.

VNI: 100
Multicast Group:

Lab Validation

In the following packet capture, traffic to UDP port 8472 can be seen between two endpoints.

The ICMP ping test between server 1 ( and server 2 ( is also visible

Pings between Server 1 and Servers 2 & 3





10 thoughts to “MikroTik – RouterOSv7 first look – VxLAN”

      1. It can handle BUM traffic in more efficient way (encapsulated inside IP multicast) instead of copying such traffic multiple times to other endpoints. It requires properly working multicast routing to work. Unfortunately it doesn’t solve CE multihoming issues as pure VXLAN is still based on hardware mac learning on VTEPs. Such problems (and many others like anycast gateways or LACP distributed across IP fabric) can be solved if used in conjunction with EVPN based control plane. I hope mikrotik guys are working on this.

    1. VxLAN solves a number of scale and loop avoidance issues that VPLS has. It also does not require LDP or other MPLS signalling and can work over IP.

      Also, you can use a 1500 byte MTU, you just have to adjust the IP MTU on the transit links. I was building the lab quickly and just lowered the tunnel but you can certainly use a larger MTU if the equipment supports it.

  1. You mention unicast:

    > The initial release of VxLAN is based on unicast and multicast to deliver Layer 2 frames.

    I can’t see how to configure that, is it possible, or is it only multicast at present?

  2. Thanks for the Post Kevin.
    Have you tried the VxLAN over PPPoE? I see currently the VxLAN uses multicast, can this be changed to Unicast?

  3. Good functionnality at last ! And good article.

    Is VXLAN would be the swiss knife in front of L3-MPLS / EVPN and current WAN-based enterprises connectivities ?
    Does it have chance to be really largely adopted ?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *